n = 8 proved ★ corrects Nagamochi 2005O=
Proven
- new result
- optimal
- exact
Citation record n-008
lowerKarakuş 2026 corrects Nagamochi 2005 (confirmed T-083, T-084)
Bounds
3
- Proved by
- Said El Moumni 1999
- Kind
- counting
- Note
- El Moumni derives this case from Proposition 3's parallel-line intersection-length bound (printed pp. 288–289). Friedman's distinct DS7 Theorem 3 uses seven unavoidable points.
- Source
- [El Moumni 1999]
- Evidence
E-migrated-lower-report
The reported value, verified here.
- Corrects
- Nagamochi 2005 (T-007)
- Evidence
E-karakus-strip-lower,E-karakus-strip-measure-interval
0
Solved: the verified bounds meet.
Results in the register
T-007 V0 C1 Nagamochi · 2026-08-31 · 321 cases
for
T-058 V3 C3 wand125 after Tokoharu, Daniel · 2026-09-29 · 100 cases
Rectangle-certificate ceiling
α·UB(n)proved for ..100;B·UB(n)on 64 grid rowsT-083 V3 C3 Karakuş · 2026-10-02 · 301 cases
for every nonsquare
T-084 V3 C3 Karakuş · 2026-10-02 · 16 cases
for every integer ; are the cases held here
upper: replayed here; lower: external proof (read here), audited here
—
not rigid, numerically checked, numerical multiprecision
Evidence: E-translation-escape-not-rigid
Scope
Square 5 of the retained witness (witness id 6) translates 1 along (0, 1) with the packing still valid, so the configuration admits a non-trivial feasible motion; 2 of its 8 squares do. Every constraint is exactly affine in the slide parameter, so the arithmetic carries no linearization error, but the coordinates are the witness's own finite-precision transcription: this settles the retained configuration, not the true optimum. Rigidity and optimality are independent, and this bears only on the former.
- Priority: s(8) determined (Bajmoczy (via Schrijver, via Gobel))
6 evidence entries
E-kingbird-upper-register, E-migrated-lower-report, E-basic-grid-upper, E-karakus-strip-lower, E-karakus-strip-measure-interval, E-nagamochi-lower
- [Kingbird] record catalogue
- [El Moumni 1999] lower bound proof
- [Friedman DS7] survey
- [Karakuş 2026] lower bound proof
— solved
. El Moumni (1999) obtains the bound from parallel-line intersection lengths.
The packing
The record catalogue does not picture : no arrangement has ever been found that beats the trivial grid, so the grid is still the best known packing. That is a statement about what has been searched, not a proof.
The lower bound
El Moumni’s Proposition 3, printed pp. 288–289 (volume PDF pp. 294–295), counts the lengths of intersections between the packed squares and parallel line segments. Proposition 2 gives a minimum contribution from each square; the total available segment length bounds their sum. The last sentence of printed p. 289 applies this argument to .
Friedman’s DS7, Theorem 3 gives a distinct proof using seven unavoidable points (Figure 25).
The verified lower-bound evidence recorded here is Karakuş’s rectangle bound,
E-karakus-strip-lower, which gives exactly (T-084). Correction, 2
October 2026: until that date it was the Nagamochi result, E-nagamochi-lower, whose
published proof rests on Nagamochi’s Lemma 1, which Karakuş showed false; its value here
is the same, and it is now a reported bound
(review of 2 October 2026).
This register had recorded that proof as verified, its own error, logged as defect
D-516.
Verification Code
The programs behind this case’s verified bounds, by their evidence.
The code column says how the code that ran stands to the code its producer used.
VERIFIERS.md says what each program is and whose it is.
| bound | evidence | run | code | programs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| verified lower | E-karakus-strip-lower |
a published proof | no code | no verification code |
| verified lower | E-karakus-strip-measure-interval |
audited here | independent | V-check-karakus-strip-measure (first-party) |
| verified upper | E-basic-grid-upper |
replayed here | independent | V-check-basic-bounds (first-party) |