n = 8 proved ★ corrects Nagamochi 2005O=

s(8)=3

The best packing known for 8 squares, side 3,
3
234
2.8283.828
nn+1

Proven

s(8)=3

  • new result
  • optimal
  • exact

Citation record n-008

lowerKarakuş 2026 corrects Nagamochi 2005 (confirmed T-083, T-084)

Bounds

Best known packing

3

Construction
grid
Tilt angles
0∘
Source
[Kingbird]
Evidence
E-kingbird-upper-register
Verified upper bound

3

The reported value, verified here.

Evidence
E-basic-grid-upper
Reported lower bound

3

Proved by
Said El Moumni 1999
Kind
counting
Note
El Moumni derives this case from Proposition 3's parallel-line intersection-length bound (printed pp. 288–289). Friedman's distinct DS7 Theorem 3 uses seven unavoidable points.
Source
[El Moumni 1999]
Evidence
E-migrated-lower-report
Verified lower bound

3

The reported value, verified here.

Corrects
Nagamochi 2005 (T-007)
Evidence
E-karakus-strip-lower, E-karakus-strip-measure-interval
Gap

0

Solved: the verified bounds meet.

Results in the register

Verification

upper: replayed here; lower: external proof (read here), audited here

—

Rigidity

not rigid, numerically checked, numerical multiprecision

Evidence: E-translation-escape-not-rigid

Scope

Square 5 of the retained witness (witness id 6) translates 1 along (0, 1) with the packing still valid, so the configuration admits a non-trivial feasible motion; 2 of its 8 squares do. Every constraint is exactly affine in the slide parameter, so the arithmetic carries no linearization error, but the coordinates are the witness's own finite-precision transcription: this settles the retained configuration, not the true optimum. Rigidity and optimality are independent, and this bears only on the former.

Open questions
  • Priority: s(8) determined (Bajmoczy (via Schrijver, via Gobel))

s(8) — solved

s(8)=3. El Moumni (1999) obtains the bound from parallel-line intersection lengths.

The packing

The record catalogue does not picture n=8: no arrangement has ever been found that beats the trivial ⌈8⌉=3 grid, so the grid is still the best known packing. That is a statement about what has been searched, not a proof.

The lower bound

El Moumni’s Proposition 3, printed pp. 288–289 (volume PDF pp. 294–295), counts the lengths of intersections between the packed squares and parallel line segments. Proposition 2 gives a minimum contribution from each square; the total available segment length bounds their sum. The last sentence of printed p. 289 applies this argument to n=8.

Friedman’s DS7, Theorem 3 gives a distinct proof using seven unavoidable points (Figure 25).

The verified lower-bound evidence recorded here is Karakuş’s rectangle bound, E-karakus-strip-lower, which gives exactly s(k2−1)=k (T-084). Correction, 2 October 2026: until that date it was the Nagamochi result, E-nagamochi-lower, whose published proof rests on Nagamochi’s Lemma 1, which Karakuş showed false; its value here is the same, and it is now a reported bound (review of 2 October 2026). This register had recorded that proof as verified, its own error, logged as defect D-516.

Verification Code

The programs behind this case’s verified bounds, by their evidence. The code column says how the code that ran stands to the code its producer used. VERIFIERS.md says what each program is and whose it is.

bound evidence run code programs
verified lower E-karakus-strip-lower a published proof no code no verification code
verified lower E-karakus-strip-measure-interval audited here independent V-check-karakus-strip-measure (first-party)
verified upper E-basic-grid-upper replayed here independent V-check-basic-bounds (first-party)