n = 40 open ★=R

6710≤s(40)≤4+22

The best packing known for 40 squares, side 4+22, Frits Göbel 1979
6.7006.828
678
6.3257.325
nn+1

Proven

6.700000≤s(40)≤6.828428

  • new result
  • exact
  • rigid (catalogue)

Citation record n-040

lowerwand125 after Tokoharu, Levy et al. 2026, GitHub (confirmed T-074)

upperGöbel 1979, Squares in Squares

Open

  • optimality

Bounds

Best known packing

4+22

6.82842712474619
Found by
Frits Göbel 1979
Construction
hand, catalogue rigid
Source
[Kingbird]
Evidence
E-kingbird-upper-register, E-n040-gobel-upper
Verified upper bound

4+22

6.82842712474619009760337744842

The reported value, verified here.

Evidence
E-n040-gobel-upper
Reported lower bound

6710

Proved by
wand125 2026
Kind
counting
Scope
Unrestricted square packing with independent rotations and disjoint interiors.
Note
Rectangle-density certificate in Tokoharu's format, reported in the retained source and accepted there by Tokoharu's unchanged interval checker. The verified lane records the local replay separately.
Source
[wand125 rectangle bounds 2026-10-01]
Evidence
E-wand125-rectangle-2026-10-01-report
Verified lower bound

6710

The reported value, verified here.

Evidence
E-wand125-rectangle-2026-10-01-source-replay
Gap

22−2710≈ 0.12842712…

Verified upper minus verified lower.

Results in the register

Verification

upper: replayed here; lower: replayed here

—

Rigidity

undetermined, verified, exact algebraic

Evidence: E-n040-first-order-flexibility

Scope

Assessed and not settled, on a first-party exact argument rather than on a screen miss. Over Q(sqrt 2) at Goebel's exact construction, the packing is infinitesimally FLEXIBLE: seven retained directions turn the sixteen squares of the tilted central block and leave the twenty-four axis-aligned ones fixed, each verified in the field. Each is then refused at second order by a verified non-negative self-stress. The property stays undetermined rather than moving to not-rigid because an infinitesimal flex is not a motion -- along every one of these the gaps curve shut at order t^2 -- so what is settled is that no first-order argument can establish rigidity here, not that the packing moves. The cone is bounded to dimension at most 45 by 75 certificates and is not characterised; the seven known directions span 6. Fixed side throughout. What a source says about this packing's rigidity is carried by reported_upper_bound.catalogue_rigid and is deliberately not restated here as a finding of ours.

s(40) — open

External intake, 2026-10-01. wand125’s rectangle-density source reports s(40)≥67/10=6.7, with total mass 3999/100=39.99<40, accepted by Tokoharu’s unchanged interval checker. The complete 201-direction coverage replay here accepted it again, after this repository’s exact audit checked that the regenerated checker input is the published one and checked the mass and net premises, so it is also verified. wand125’s README says parts of the work were produced with AI assistance under human direction.

External intake, 2026-09-27. wand125’s rectangle-density source reports a direct 1339/200=6.695 certificate for this case, whose reported bound the 2026-10-01 intake above raises, with total mass 3999/100=39.99<40, accepted by Tokoharu’s unchanged interval checker. This repository’s exact audit checks that the regenerated checker input is the published one, and checks the mass and net premises; the complete coverage replay has not yet run here, so the verified lower bound is unchanged. wand125’s README says parts of the work were produced with AI assistance under human direction.

External intake, 2026-09-22. wand125’s retained point-certificate source reports s(40)≥13/2=6.5, which was the verified lower bound until 2026-10-02. The complete exact replay verifies the retained certificate.

Open. The verified interval has endpoints 6.695 and approximately 6.828427125, exactly 1339/200 and 4+22, leaving a gap of about 0.1334. Its lower end is wand125’s replayed rectangle-density certificate (T-045, 2026-10-02).

The packing

Found by Frits Göbel in 1979, via a hand construction. The catalogue flags it rigid: no continuous deformation is possible, so the contact conditions pin the side length exactly as an algebraic number.

The lower bound

The earlier record from [Friedman DS7] gives the lower-bound expression 22+85/5 for s(40) (approximately 6.406135888746). Friedman’s DS7 survey, Theorem 10, k=6, reports this bound at n=40; reference [8] is Green’s private communication (2000). The source proof has not been recovered. That report remains as historical evidence; the verified point certificate gave the stronger bound 13/2, and the replayed rectangle-density certificate now gives 1339/200. The source audit compares the exact theorem expressions separately from opaque table decimals.

The exact replay verifies all five covering-certificate conditions over the complete rational direction net. A second interval implementation or generalized native importer would add confirmation and reuse, but it is not a missing premise of this fixed bound.

Corrected 2 October 2026: Nagamochi’s Lemma 1 is false (Karakuş 2026), so his closed form below is now a reported bound whose published proof is incomplete (review). This register had recorded that proof as verified, its own error, logged as defect D-516. Nagamochi’s earlier general closed form remains part of the evidence history and applies to every N≥4:

s(N)≥min{⌈N⌉,N−2⌊N⌋+1+1}

Verification Code

The programs behind this case’s verified bounds, by their evidence. The code column says how the code that ran stands to the code its producer used. VERIFIERS.md says what each program is and whose it is.

bound evidence run code programs
verified lower E-wand125-rectangle-2026-10-01-source-replay replayed here producer’s code V-tokoharu-verify-cpp (external); V-audit-wand125-rectangles (first-party, premises)
verified upper E-n040-gobel-upper replayed here independent V-sqpack-verify (first-party)