n = 38 open ★=

1309200≤s(38)≤6+122

The best packing known for 38 squares, side 6+122, Frits Göbel 1979
6.5456.707
678
6.1647.164
nn+1

Proven

6.545000≤s(38)≤6.707107

  • new result
  • exact

Citation record n-038

lowerwand125 after Tokoharu, Levy et al. 2026, GitHub (confirmed T-074)

upperGöbel 1979, Squares in Squares

Open

  • optimality

Bounds

Best known packing

6+122

6.70710678118654
Found by
Frits Göbel 1979
Construction
strip
Source
[Kingbird]
Evidence
E-kingbird-upper-register, E-gobel-strip-upper
Verified upper bound

6+122

6.70710678118654752440084436210485

The reported value, verified here.

Evidence
E-gobel-strip-upper
Reported lower bound

1309200

Proved by
wand125 2026
Kind
counting
Scope
Unrestricted square packing with independent rotations and disjoint interiors.
Note
Rectangle-density certificate in Tokoharu's format, reported in the retained source and accepted there by Tokoharu's unchanged interval checker. The verified lane records the local replay separately.
Source
[wand125 rectangle bounds 2026-10-01]
Evidence
E-wand125-rectangle-2026-10-01-report
Verified lower bound

1309200

The reported value, verified here.

Evidence
E-wand125-rectangle-2026-10-01-source-replay
Gap

22−109200≈ 0.16210678…

Verified upper minus verified lower.

Results in the register

Verification

upper: replayed here; lower: replayed here

—

Rigidity

not rigid, numerically checked, numerical multiprecision

Evidence: E-translation-escape-not-rigid

Scope

Square 15 of the retained witness (witness id 16) translates 0.328427 along (-0.707107, -0.707107) with the packing still valid, so the configuration admits a non-trivial feasible motion; 4 of its 38 squares do. Every constraint is exactly affine in the slide parameter, so the arithmetic carries no linearization error, but the coordinates are the witness's own finite-precision transcription: this settles the retained configuration, not the true optimum. Rigidity and optimality are independent, and this bears only on the former.

Open questions
  • Blocker (source evidence): Green's reported lower-bound proof, cited as private communication by Friedman, has not been recovered or independently replayed. E-green-ds7-theorem9-reported-lower

s(38) — open

External intake, 2026-10-01. wand125’s rectangle-density source reports s(38)≥1309/200=6.545, with total mass 3799/100=37.99<38, accepted by Tokoharu’s unchanged interval checker. The complete 201-direction coverage replay here accepted it again, after this repository’s exact audit checked that the regenerated checker input is the published one and checked the mass and net premises, so it is also verified. wand125’s README says parts of the work were produced with AI assistance under human direction.

External intake, 2026-09-28. wand125’s rectangle-density source reports a direct 327/50=6.54 certificate for this case, whose reported bound the 2026-10-01 intake above raises, with total mass 3799/100=37.99<38, accepted by Tokoharu’s unchanged interval checker. This repository’s exact audit checks that the regenerated checker input is the published one, and checks the mass and net premises; the complete coverage replay has not yet run here, so the verified lower bound is unchanged. wand125’s README says parts of the work were produced with AI assistance under human direction.

External intake, 2026-09-27. wand125’s rectangle-density source reports a direct 163/25=6.52 certificate for this case, whose reported bound the 2026-09-28 intake above raises, with total mass 3799/100=37.99<38, accepted by Tokoharu’s unchanged interval checker. This repository’s exact audit checks that the regenerated checker input is the published one, and checks the mass and net premises; the complete coverage replay has not yet run here, so the verified lower bound is unchanged.

Open. The best known packing gives s(38)≤6.70710679, and the verified lower bound is s(38)≥1309/200=6.545, from wand125’s rectangle-density certificate of 1 October (T-074), leaving a gap of about 0.1621.

The packing

Found by Frits Göbel in 1979, via a diagonal-strip construction — the strip family at a=5, whose side is 6+2/2 exactly. cases/gobel_strip builds it and verifies it exactly over Q(sqrt 2), which is what moved verified_upper_bound from the grid ceiling onto the exact side. The retained witness declares that side rounded down at its own digits — about 4.85×10−30 below the exact value — and a different slack choice for the strip, so the certificate carries the construction’s coordinates rather than the witness’s (D-398).

The lower bound

The earlier external report, [Friedman DS7], gives the lower-bound expression 103/37+22+113/37 for s(38) (approximately 6.350603018684). Friedman’s DS7 survey, Theorem 9, k=6, reports this bound at n=37; reference [8] is Green’s private communication (2000). The source proof has not been recovered. The unavoidable-set argument DS7’s Figure 34 illustrates does not prove it: at k=6 that point pattern leaves a unit square empty (review). Inherited at n=38 by monotonicity. wand125’s rectangle-density certificate above has since replaced it in the reported field, and since its replay here on 2026-10-02 it is also the verified lower bound. The source audit compares the exact theorem expressions separately from opaque table decimals.

Nagamochi’s general closed form, the verified lower bound before this certificate, is now a reported bound (see the correction below). Karakuş’s general bound, independently verified here and below this certificate at this n, applies to every nonsquare N≥8:

s(N)≥12+N−⌊N⌋+14

Correction, 2 October 2026. Until that date the verified lower bound here was Nagamochi’s general closed form, s(N)≥min(⌈N⌉,N−2⌊N⌋+1+1), which is stronger at this n and is now recorded as a reported bound. Its published proof rests on Nagamochi’s Lemma 1, which Karakuş showed false; nothing is disproved, and no packing beating it is known (review of 2 October 2026). This register had recorded that proof as verified, its own error, logged as defect D-516.

See the Frontier corpus summary for the current aggregate count; source-reported bounds are recorded separately.

Verification Code

The programs behind this case’s verified bounds, by their evidence. The code column says how the code that ran stands to the code its producer used. VERIFIERS.md says what each program is and whose it is.

bound evidence run code programs
verified lower E-wand125-rectangle-2026-10-01-source-replay replayed here producer’s code V-tokoharu-verify-cpp (external); V-audit-wand125-rectangles (first-party, premises)
verified upper E-gobel-strip-upper replayed here independent V-sqpack-verify (first-party)