n = 33 provedO=

s(33)=6

The best packing known for 33 squares, side 6, Wolfram Bentz 2018
6
567
5.7456.745
nn+1

Proven

s(33)=6

  • optimal
  • exact

Citation record n-033

lowerBentz 2016, arXiv:1606.03746 (confirmed T-064)

Bounds

Best known packing

6

Found by
Wolfram Bentz 2018
Construction
hand
Source
[Kingbird]
Evidence
E-kingbird-upper-register
Verified upper bound

6

The reported value, verified here.

Evidence
E-basic-grid-upper
Reported lower bound

6

Proved by
Wolfram Bentz 2016
Kind
unavoidable points
Source
[Bentz 2016]
Evidence
E-bentz-2016-proof
Verified lower bound

6

The reported value, verified here.

Evidence
E-bentz-2016-proof, E-k2m3-evand-valid7-qx2-replay, E-k2m3-evand-bentz-lean-build
Gap

0

Solved: the verified bounds meet.

Results in the register

Verification

upper: replayed here; lower: external proof (not read here), replayed here

—

Rigidity

not rigid, numerically checked, numerical multiprecision

Evidence: E-translation-escape-not-rigid

Scope

Square 27 of the retained witness (witness id 28) translates 1 along (0, 1) with the packing still valid, so the configuration admits a non-trivial feasible motion; 4 of its 33 squares do. Every constraint is exactly affine in the slide parameter, so the arithmetic carries no linearization error, but the coordinates are the witness's own finite-precision transcription: this settles the retained configuration, not the true optimum. Rigidity and optimality are independent, and this bears only on the former.

s(33) — solved

s(33)=6. Established by an unavoidable point set, Wolfram Bentz (2016).

The packing

Found by Wolfram Bentz in 2018, via a hand construction.

The lower bound

Proved by exhibiting an unavoidable set: a set of points in the container that every unit square placed inside must contain. With n−1 such points, n disjoint squares are impossible by pigeonhole. Nobody here has worked through Bentz’s argument.

A second proof, replayed here

s(33)=6 is also the case k=6 of Evan Daniel’s s(k2−3)=k for every integer k≥6 (T-064). Its lower half rests on one finite statement, Valid7, and on a Lean reduction from it to every k≥6. Daniel’s exact checker of Valid7 was replayed here in full on the retained cover on 2 and 3 October 2026, every root’s leaves equal to the published run’s (E-k2m3-evand-valid7-qx2-replay), and the reduction was built here with the pinned toolchain and depends only on the standard axioms (E-k2m3-evand-bentz-lean-build). The verified lower bound cites both beside Bentz’s proof since 6 October 2026; until then it cited the proof alone. The source’s CREDITS.md says the work was produced by Claude (Anthropic) in a single session under human direction.

Verification Code

The programs behind this case’s verified bounds, by their evidence. The code column says how the code that ran stands to the code its producer used. VERIFIERS.md says what each program is and whose it is.

bound evidence run code programs
verified lower E-bentz-2016-proof a published proof no code no verification code
verified lower E-k2m3-evand-valid7-qx2-replay replayed here producer’s code V-evand-qx2-zm-py (external)
verified lower E-k2m3-evand-bentz-lean-build replayed here producer’s code V-evand-lean (external)
verified upper E-basic-grid-upper replayed here independent V-check-basic-bounds (first-party)