n = 321 proved ★O=
Proven
- new result
- optimal
- exact
Citation record n-321
lowerDaniel after Burns, Massaccesi 2026, GitHub (confirmed T-064)
Bounds
- Proved by
- Evan Daniel 2026
- Kind
- counting
- Scope
- Unrestricted unit-square packing with independent rotations and disjoint interiors.
- Note
- Evan Daniel's evand/square-packing (30 September 2026) states s(k^2 - 3) = k for every integer k >= 6, which gives at k = 18. By the source's report, its Lean development derives the family from one finite covering statement, Valid7, which a single exact-rational Python checker at the source decides; both were rebuilt here on 2 and 3 October 2026. Its CREDITS.md says the work was produced by Claude (Anthropic) in a single session under human direction.
- Source
- [evand square-packing 2026-10-01]
- Evidence
E-k2m3-evand-family-report
The reported value, verified here.
0
Solved: the verified bounds meet.
Results in the register
T-007 V0 C1 Nagamochi · 2026-08-31 · 321 cases
for
T-064 V3 C3 Daniel after Burns, Massaccesi · 2026-10-01 · 13 cases
for every integer from 6 up; are the cases held here
T-083 V3 C3 Karakuş · 2026-10-02 · 301 cases
for every nonsquare
T-085 V3 C3 Karakuş; chelokot · 2026-10-02 · 315 cases
Nagamochi 2005, Lemma 1 is false for every container with and
upper: replayed here; lower: replayed here
—
not rigid, numerically checked, numerical multiprecision
Evidence: E-translation-escape-not-rigid
Scope
Square 303 of the retained witness (witness id 304) translates 1 along (0, 1) with the packing still valid, so the configuration admits a non-trivial feasible motion; 4 of its 321 squares do. Every constraint is exactly affine in the slide parameter, so the arithmetic carries no linearization error, but the coordinates are the witness's own finite-precision transcription: this settles the retained configuration, not the true optimum. Rigidity and optimality are independent, and this bears only on the former.
9 evidence entries
E-k2m3-evand-valid7-qx2-replay, E-k2m3-wand125-valid7-independent, E-k2m3-evand-bentz-lean-build, E-k2m3-evand-family-report, E-kingbird-grid-completeness, E-nagamochi-lower, E-basic-grid-upper, E-karakus-strip-lower, E-nagamochi-lemma1-counterexample
- [evand square-packing 2026-10-01] lower bound proof
- [Kingbird] record catalogue
- [Nagamochi 2005] lower bound proof
- [Friedman DS7] survey
- [Karakuş 2026] lower bound proof
— solved
, as the case of Evan Daniel’s for every integer
(T-064). The lower half rests on one finite statement, Valid7, and on a Lean
reduction from it to every . Daniel’s exact checker of Valid7 was replayed
here in full on the retained cover, every root’s leaves equal to the published run’s,
and the reduction was built here with the pinned toolchain and depends only on the
standard axioms. The grid holds 321 squares.
The source’s CREDITS.md says the work was produced by Claude (Anthropic) in a single
session under human direction.
External intake, 2026-10-01. Evan Daniel’s
source reports
as the case of for every integer
(T-064). By the source’s report, its Lean development derives the family from one finite
covering statement, Valid7, which a single exact Python checker at the source decides.
Neither had been run here when this was written, so the verified lower bound was
unchanged and the case stayed open; both were rebuilt on 2 and 3 October.
The source’s CREDITS.md says the work was produced by Claude (Anthropic) in a single
session under human direction.
The packing
The record catalogue does not picture : no arrangement has ever been found that beats the trivial grid, so the grid is still the best known packing. That was a statement about what had been searched, not a proof; T-064 now proves that none exists.
The lower bound
Nagamochi’s general closed form was the verified lower bound until 2 October 2026 and is now a reported bound (see the correction below); from then until T-064’s replay it was Karakuş’s general bound, which applies to every nonsquare :
Correction, 2 October 2026. Until that date the verified lower bound here was Nagamochi’s general closed form, , which is stronger at this and is now recorded as a reported bound. Its published proof rests on Nagamochi’s Lemma 1, which Karakuş showed false; nothing is disproved, and no packing beating it is known (review of 2 October 2026). This register had recorded that proof as verified, its own error, logged as defect D-516.
Source-reported bounds are recorded separately from this independently verified theorem.
Verification Code
The programs behind this case’s verified bounds, by their evidence.
The code column says how the code that ran stands to the code its producer used.
VERIFIERS.md says what each program is and whose it is.
| bound | evidence | run | code | programs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| verified lower | E-k2m3-evand-valid7-qx2-replay |
replayed here | producer’s code | V-evand-qx2-zm-py (external) |
| verified lower | E-k2m3-evand-bentz-lean-build |
replayed here | producer’s code | V-evand-lean (external) |
| verified upper | E-basic-grid-upper |
replayed here | independent | V-check-basic-bounds (first-party) |