n = 292 open ★ corrects Nagamochi 2005≈

17.09066002…≤s(292)≤175972493911995191000000000000000

The best packing known for 292 squares, side 17.59724939…, Francisco Couzo 2026
17.09117.597
171819
17.08818.088
nn+1

Proven

17.090660≤s(292)≤17.597250

  • new result
  • numerical

Citation record n-292

lowerKarakuş 2026, arXiv corrects Nagamochi 2005 (confirmed T-083)

upperCouzo 2026, GitHub (confirmed T-056)

Open

  • optimality
  • exact value

Bounds

Best known packing

17.59724939…

17.597249391199519
Found by
Francisco Couzo 2026
Construction
—
Source
[franciscouzo square-packing 2026-09-27]
Evidence
E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-report
Verified upper bound

175972493911995191000000000000000

17.597249391199519

The reported value, verified here.

Evidence
E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-exact-replay, E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-interval-replay
Reported lower bound

834145+22+2031145

17.15703136722
Proved by
Trevor Green 2000
Kind
monotone
Scope
Source-reported only; no verification promotion.
Note
Friedman's DS7 survey, Theorem 9, k=17, reports this bound at n=290; reference [8] is Green's private communication (2000). The source proof has not been recovered. The unavoidable-set argument DS7's Figure 34 illustrates does not prove it: at k=17 that point pattern leaves a unit square empty (devtools.check_green_ds7). Inherited at n=292 by monotonicity.
Source
[Friedman DS7]
Evidence
E-green-ds7-theorem9-reported-lower
Verified lower bound

17.09066002…

17.090660023
Corrects
Nagamochi 2005 (T-007)
Evidence
E-karakus-strip-lower, E-karakus-strip-measure-interval
Gap

0.50658936…

Verified upper minus verified lower.

Results in the register

Verification

upper: replayed here; lower: external proof (read here), audited here

formal lower differs from report; reported lower: defect recorded

Rigidity

not rigid, numerically checked, numerical multiprecision

Evidence: E-translation-escape-not-rigid

Scope

Square 0 of the retained witness (witness id 1) translates 0.000003 along (0.00001, 1) with the packing still valid, so the configuration admits a non-trivial feasible motion; 92 of its 292 squares do. Every constraint is exactly affine in the slide parameter, so the arithmetic carries no linearization error, but the coordinates are the witness's own finite-precision transcription: this settles the retained configuration, not the true optimum. Rigidity and optimality are independent, and this bears only on the former.

Open questions
  • Blocker (source evidence): Green's reported lower-bound proof, cited as private communication by Friedman, has not been recovered or independently replayed. E-green-ds7-theorem9-reported-lower
  • Priority: s(292) <= 17.60256849240573729, Griffin Casson's packing, larger than the reported side (Griffin Casson)
  • Priority: s(292) <= 17.601260370442159, the first of Francisco Couzo's packings for this count (Francisco Couzo)

s(292) — open

Open. The best known published packing, Francisco Couzo’s (T-056), gives s(292)≤17.597249391199519, and the strongest lower bound independently verified here is 17.090660 from Karakuş’s general theorem, leaving a gap of 0.5066. General bound: s(N) >= 1/2 + sqrt(N - floor(sqrt(N)) + 1/4).

The packing

Francisco Couzo’s square-packing reports a packing of side 17.597249391199519 for this count, dated 27 September 2026 and unchanged when this record retained the repository on 27 September 2026 (T-056). Its first packing for this count, of side 17.601260370442159, is dated 26 September 2026. The repository names no method and no tolerance, and itself states no AI assistance; its author said on issue #227 that he found the 102 and 103 packings “with the help of Claude”.

This repository certifies it exactly. The retained decimal pose rounds to an exact rational packing at centre dilation 1, of side 17.5972493911995189091…, no larger than the printed side, and every pair and every wall is decided over ℚ twice, by the promotion’s exact separating-axis test and by an independent checker that shares no code with it (receipt). That proves s(292)≤17.597249391199519, the verified upper bound; it says nothing about optimality. Interval arithmetic on the printed pose itself, with each angle’s true cosine and sine and no rational rounding, decides every pair and wall again and gives the same verified upper bound (interval route).

Griffin Casson’s square-packing, dated 23 September 2026 and made with the help of Claude as its README says, reports a packing of side 17.60256849240573729 for this count, larger than Couzo’s by 0.00531910120621829. Casson’s is the earlier of the two by the timestamps this record’s priority notes keep: Couzo’s first packing for this count, of side 17.601260370442159, is dated 26 September 2026. The record states both dates and infers nothing about whether either packing derives from the other.

The previous best known packing

Before this intake the best known packing was the Kingbird catalogue’s, of side 17.60257141234448.

Found by an unrecorded author, via extension of a smaller record. Its side length is algebraic of degree 8 over ℚ.

The lower bound

The strongest lower bound independently verified in this record is Karakuş’s general bound, which applies to every nonsquare N≥8:

s(N)≥12+N−⌊N⌋+14

Correction, 2 October 2026. Until that date the verified lower bound here was Nagamochi’s general closed form, s(N)≥min(⌈N⌉,N−2⌊N⌋+1+1), which is stronger at this n and is now recorded as a reported bound. Its published proof rests on Nagamochi’s Lemma 1, which Karakuş showed false; nothing is disproved, and no packing beating it is known (review of 2 October 2026). This register had recorded that proof as verified, its own error, logged as defect D-516.

Source-reported bounds are recorded separately from this independently verified theorem.

The reported lower-bound expression for s(292) is 834/145+22+2031/145 (approximately 17.15703136722). Friedman’s DS7 survey, Theorem 9, k=17, reports this bound at n=290; reference [8] is Green’s private communication (2000). The source proof has not been recovered. The unavoidable-set argument DS7’s Figure 34 illustrates does not prove it: at k=17 that point pattern leaves a unit square empty (devtools.check_green_ds7). Inherited at n=292 by monotonicity. This is a source-reported lower bound; it does not replace the verified bound above. The exact specialization and comparison are retained by audit_ds7_lower_bounds.

Verification Code

The programs behind this case’s verified bounds, by their evidence. The code column says how the code that ran stands to the code its producer used. VERIFIERS.md says what each program is and whose it is.

bound evidence run code programs
verified lower E-karakus-strip-lower a published proof no code no verification code
verified lower E-karakus-strip-measure-interval audited here independent V-check-karakus-strip-measure (first-party)
verified upper E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-exact-replay replayed here independent V-upper-bound-promotion, V-check-rational-witness-independent (first-party)
verified upper E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-interval-replay replayed here independent V-upper-bound-intervals (first-party)