n = 242 open ★ corrects Nagamochi 2005=

15.57481343…≤s(242)≤16

The best packing known for 242 squares, side 16,
15.57516
151617
15.55616.556
nn+1

Proven

15.574813≤s(242)≤16

  • new result
  • exact

Citation record n-242

lowerKarakuş 2026, arXiv corrects Nagamochi 2005 (confirmed T-083)

Open

  • optimality

Bounds

Best known packing

16

Construction
grid
Tilt angles
0∘
Source
[Kingbird]
Evidence
E-kingbird-grid-completeness
Verified upper bound

16

The reported value, verified here.

Evidence
E-basic-grid-upper
Reported lower bound

15.59451951…

15.59451951932
Proved by
Hiroshi Nagamochi 2005
Kind
Nagamochi
Note
General closed form: s(N) >= min(ceil(sqrt(N)), sqrt(N - 2*floor(sqrt(N)) + 1) + 1).
Source
[Nagamochi 2005]
Evidence
E-nagamochi-lower
Verified lower bound

15.57481343…

15.5748134316
Corrects
Nagamochi 2005 (T-007)
Evidence
E-karakus-strip-lower, E-karakus-strip-measure-interval
Gap

312−31012≈ 0.42518656…

Verified upper minus verified lower.

Results in the register

Verification

upper: replayed here; lower: external proof (read here), audited here

formal lower differs from report; reported lower: defect recorded

Rigidity

not rigid, numerically checked, numerical multiprecision

Evidence: E-translation-escape-not-rigid

Scope

Square 226 of the retained witness (witness id 227) translates 1 along (0, 1) with the packing still valid, so the configuration admits a non-trivial feasible motion; 15 of its 242 squares do. Every constraint is exactly affine in the slide parameter, so the arithmetic carries no linearization error, but the coordinates are the witness's own finite-precision transcription: this settles the retained configuration, not the true optimum. Rigidity and optimality are independent, and this bears only on the former.

s(242) — open

Open. The best known packing gives s(242)≤16, and the strongest lower bound independently verified here is 15.574813 from Karakuş’s general theorem, leaving a gap of 0.4252. General bound: s(N) >= 1/2 + sqrt(N - floor(sqrt(N)) + 1/4).

The packing

The record catalogue does not picture n=242: no arrangement has ever been found that beats the trivial ⌈242⌉=16 grid, so the grid is still the best known packing. That is a statement about what has been searched, not a proof.

The lower bound

The strongest lower bound independently verified in this record is Karakuş’s general bound, which applies to every nonsquare N≥8:

s(N)≥12+N−⌊N⌋+14

Correction, 2 October 2026. Until that date the verified lower bound here was Nagamochi’s general closed form, s(N)≥min(⌈N⌉,N−2⌊N⌋+1+1), which is stronger at this n and is now recorded as a reported bound. Its published proof rests on Nagamochi’s Lemma 1, which Karakuş showed false; nothing is disproved, and no packing beating it is known (review of 2 October 2026). This register had recorded that proof as verified, its own error, logged as defect D-516.

Source-reported bounds are recorded separately from this independently verified theorem.

Verification Code

The programs behind this case’s verified bounds, by their evidence. The code column says how the code that ran stands to the code its producer used. VERIFIERS.md says what each program is and whose it is.

bound evidence run code programs
verified lower E-karakus-strip-lower a published proof no code no verification code
verified lower E-karakus-strip-measure-interval audited here independent V-check-karakus-strip-measure (first-party)
verified upper E-basic-grid-upper replayed here independent V-check-basic-bounds (first-party)