n = 221 open reported proved ★ corrects Nagamochi 2005=

14.89618004…≤s(221)≤15

The best packing known for 221 squares, side 15,
14.89615
141516
14.86615.866
nn+1

Proven

14.896180≤s(221)≤15

  • new result
  • exact

Citation record n-221

lowerKarakuş 2026, arXiv corrects Nagamochi 2005 (confirmed T-083)

Open

  • optimality

Bounds

Best known packing

15

Construction
grid
Tilt angles
0∘
Source
[Kingbird]
Evidence
E-kingbird-grid-completeness
Verified upper bound

15

The reported value, verified here.

Evidence
E-basic-grid-upper
Reported lower bound

15

Proved by
Evan Daniel 2026
Kind
counting
Scope
Unrestricted unit-square packing with independent rotations and disjoint interiors.
Note
Evan Daniel's evand/square-packing (3 October 2026) states s(k^2 - 4) = k for every integer k >= 5, which gives s(221)=15 at k = 15. By the source's report, its Lean development derives every k >= 8 from one finite covering statement on the 9 x 9 box, ValidTilt9, which the same exact-rational Python checker that decided T-064's Valid7 decides at the source; neither has been replayed here. Its CREDITS.md says the work was produced by Claude (Anthropic) in a single session under human direction.
Source
[evand square-packing 2026-10-03]
Evidence
E-k2m4-evand-family-report
Verified lower bound

14.89618004…

14.8961800488
Corrects
Nagamochi 2005 (T-007)
Evidence
E-karakus-strip-lower, E-karakus-strip-measure-interval
Gap

292−8292≈ 0.10381995…

Verified upper minus verified lower.

Results in the register

Verification

upper: replayed here; lower: external proof (read here), audited here

formal lower differs from report; proof audit pending

Rigidity

not rigid, numerically checked, numerical multiprecision

Evidence: E-translation-escape-not-rigid

Scope

Square 206 of the retained witness (witness id 207) translates 1 along (0, 1) with the packing still valid, so the configuration admits a non-trivial feasible motion; 5 of its 221 squares do. Every constraint is exactly affine in the slide parameter, so the arithmetic carries no linearization error, but the coordinates are the witness's own finite-precision transcription: this settles the retained configuration, not the true optimum. Rigidity and optimality are independent, and this bears only on the former.

s(221) — open

External intake, 2026-10-03. Evan Daniel reports s(221)=15 as an instance of s(k2−4)=k at k=15 (jlevy/squares#316). The source’s Lean proves the general reduction conditional on ValidTilt9; the exact Python checker for that premise has not been replayed here, so the verified lower bound is unchanged. The source’s CREDITS.md says this work was produced by Claude (Anthropic) in a single session under human direction.

External intake, 2026-10-06. A second, separately written exact checker, wand125’s, reports ValidTilt9 on the same cover (6 October packet, E-k2m4-wand125-validtilt9-report). Its record check and a sample of its roots ran here; the full run has not been repeated, so the verified lower bound is unchanged.

Open. The best known packing gives s(221)≤15, and the strongest lower bound independently verified here is 14.896180 from Karakuş’s general theorem, leaving a gap of 0.1038. General bound: s(N) >= 1/2 + sqrt(N - floor(sqrt(N)) + 1/4).

The packing

The record catalogue does not picture n=221: no arrangement has ever been found that beats the trivial ⌈221⌉=15 grid, so the grid is still the best known packing. That is a statement about what has been searched, not a proof.

The lower bound

The strongest lower bound independently verified in this record is Karakuş’s general bound, which applies to every nonsquare N≥8:

s(N)≥12+N−⌊N⌋+14

Correction, 2 October 2026. Until that date the verified lower bound here was Nagamochi’s general closed form, s(N)≥min(⌈N⌉,N−2⌊N⌋+1+1), which is stronger at this n and is now recorded as a reported bound. Its published proof rests on Nagamochi’s Lemma 1, which Karakuş showed false; nothing is disproved, and no packing beating it is known (review of 2 October 2026). This register had recorded that proof as verified, its own error, logged as defect D-516.

Update, 3 October 2026. The reported field now holds Evan Daniel’s reported s(221)=15 (T-081, above), which is stronger than Nagamochi’s value; that value stays on record under T-007, and the verified lower bound is still Karakuş’s.

Source-reported bounds are recorded separately from this independently verified theorem.

Verification Code

The programs behind this case’s verified bounds, by their evidence. The code column says how the code that ran stands to the code its producer used. VERIFIERS.md says what each program is and whose it is.

bound evidence run code programs
verified lower E-karakus-strip-lower a published proof no code no verification code
verified lower E-karakus-strip-measure-interval audited here independent V-check-karakus-strip-measure (first-party)
verified upper E-basic-grid-upper replayed here independent V-check-basic-bounds (first-party)