n = 221 open reported proved ★ corrects Nagamochi 2005=
Proven
- new result
- exact
Citation record n-221
lowerKarakuş 2026, arXiv corrects Nagamochi 2005 (confirmed T-083)
Open
- optimality
Bounds
- Proved by
- Evan Daniel 2026
- Kind
- counting
- Scope
- Unrestricted unit-square packing with independent rotations and disjoint interiors.
- Note
- Evan Daniel's evand/square-packing (3 October 2026) states s(k^2 - 4) = k for every integer k >= 5, which gives at k = 15. By the source's report, its Lean development derives every k >= 8 from one finite covering statement on the 9 x 9 box, ValidTilt9, which the same exact-rational Python checker that decided T-064's Valid7 decides at the source; neither has been replayed here. Its CREDITS.md says the work was produced by Claude (Anthropic) in a single session under human direction.
- Source
- [evand square-packing 2026-10-03]
- Evidence
E-k2m4-evand-family-report
14.89618004…
14.8961800488- Corrects
- Nagamochi 2005 (T-007)
- Evidence
E-karakus-strip-lower,E-karakus-strip-measure-interval
≈ 0.10381995…
Verified upper minus verified lower.
Results in the register
T-007 V0 C1 Nagamochi · 2026-08-31 · 321 cases
for
T-081 V0 C1 Daniel after Burns, Massaccesi · 2026-10-03 · 14 cases
for every integer from 5 up; are the cases held here
T-083 V3 C3 Karakuş · 2026-10-02 · 301 cases
for every nonsquare
T-085 V3 C3 Karakuş; chelokot · 2026-10-02 · 315 cases
Nagamochi 2005, Lemma 1 is false for every container with and
upper: replayed here; lower: external proof (read here), audited here
formal lower differs from report; proof audit pending
not rigid, numerically checked, numerical multiprecision
Evidence: E-translation-escape-not-rigid
Scope
Square 206 of the retained witness (witness id 207) translates 1 along (0, 1) with the packing still valid, so the configuration admits a non-trivial feasible motion; 5 of its 221 squares do. Every constraint is exactly affine in the slide parameter, so the arithmetic carries no linearization error, but the coordinates are the witness's own finite-precision transcription: this settles the retained configuration, not the true optimum. Rigidity and optimality are independent, and this bears only on the former.
9 evidence entries
E-k2m4-evand-family-report, E-k2m4-wand125-validtilt9-report, E-k2m4-evand-bentz4-lean-build, E-kingbird-grid-completeness, E-nagamochi-lower, E-basic-grid-upper, E-karakus-strip-lower, E-karakus-strip-measure-interval, E-nagamochi-lemma1-counterexample
- [evand square-packing 2026-10-03] lower bound proof
- [Kingbird] record catalogue
- [Nagamochi 2005] lower bound proof
- [Friedman DS7] survey
- [Karakuş 2026] lower bound proof
— open
External intake, 2026-10-03. Evan Daniel reports as an instance of
at
(jlevy/squares#316). The source’s Lean
proves the general reduction conditional on ValidTilt9; the exact Python checker for
that premise has not been replayed here, so the verified lower bound is unchanged.
The source’s CREDITS.md says this work was produced by Claude (Anthropic) in a single
session under human direction.
External intake, 2026-10-06. A second, separately written exact checker, wand125’s,
reports ValidTilt9 on the same cover
(6 October packet,
E-k2m4-wand125-validtilt9-report). Its record check and a sample of its roots ran
here; the full run has not been repeated, so the verified lower bound is unchanged.
Open. The best known packing gives , and the strongest lower bound independently verified here is from Karakuş’s general theorem, leaving a gap of . General bound: s(N) >= 1/2 + sqrt(N - floor(sqrt(N)) + 1/4).
The packing
The record catalogue does not picture : no arrangement has ever been found that beats the trivial grid, so the grid is still the best known packing. That is a statement about what has been searched, not a proof.
The lower bound
The strongest lower bound independently verified in this record is Karakuş’s general bound, which applies to every nonsquare :
Correction, 2 October 2026. Until that date the verified lower bound here was Nagamochi’s general closed form, , which is stronger at this and is now recorded as a reported bound. Its published proof rests on Nagamochi’s Lemma 1, which Karakuş showed false; nothing is disproved, and no packing beating it is known (review of 2 October 2026). This register had recorded that proof as verified, its own error, logged as defect D-516.
Update, 3 October 2026. The reported field now holds Evan Daniel’s reported (T-081, above), which is stronger than Nagamochi’s value; that value stays on record under T-007, and the verified lower bound is still Karakuş’s.
Source-reported bounds are recorded separately from this independently verified theorem.
Verification Code
The programs behind this case’s verified bounds, by their evidence.
The code column says how the code that ran stands to the code its producer used.
VERIFIERS.md says what each program is and whose it is.
| bound | evidence | run | code | programs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| verified lower | E-karakus-strip-lower |
a published proof | no code | no verification code |
| verified lower | E-karakus-strip-measure-interval |
audited here | independent | V-check-karakus-strip-measure (first-party) |
| verified upper | E-basic-grid-upper |
replayed here | independent | V-check-basic-bounds (first-party) |