n = 150 open ★ corrects Nagamochi 2005=
Proven
- new result
- exact
Citation record n-150
lowerKarakuş 2026, arXiv corrects Nagamochi 2005 (confirmed T-083)
upperEllsworth 2025, Squares in Squares (reported; confirmed T-101)
Open
- optimality
Bounds
12.77817459305202
- Found by
- David Ellsworth 2025
- Construction
- extension
- Source
- [Kingbird]
- Evidence
E-kingbird-upper-register
12.77817459305203
12.26942766…
12.26942766958- Proved by
- Hiroshi Nagamochi 2005
- Kind
- Nagamochi
- Note
- General closed form: >= min(ceil(sqrt(N)), sqrt(N - 2*floor(sqrt(N)) + 1) + 1).
- Source
- [Nagamochi 2005]
- Evidence
E-nagamochi-lower
12.25797601…
12.2579760163- Corrects
- Nagamochi 2005 (T-007)
- Evidence
E-karakus-strip-lower,E-karakus-strip-measure-interval
0.52019857…
Verified upper minus verified lower.
Results in the register
T-007 V0 C1 Nagamochi · 2026-08-31 · 321 cases
for
T-083 V3 C3 Karakuş · 2026-10-02 · 301 cases
for every nonsquare
T-085 V3 C3 Karakuş; chelokot · 2026-10-02 · 315 cases
Nagamochi 2005, Lemma 1 is false for every container with and
T-101 V3 C3 Daniel after Couzo, de Winter, Ellsworth, Levy · 2026-10-06 · 77 cases
Exact certificates of 77 catalogue packings:
s(n) ≤ S',1.2e-16to9.8e-15above each side
upper: replayed here; lower: external proof (read here), audited here
formal upper trails report; formal lower differs from report; reported lower: defect recorded
not rigid, numerically checked, numerical multiprecision
Evidence: E-translation-escape-not-rigid
Scope
Square 6 of the retained witness (witness id 7) translates 0.025126 along (0.707107, -0.707107) with the packing still valid, so the configuration admits a non-trivial feasible motion; 39 of its 150 squares do. Every constraint is exactly affine in the slide parameter, so the arithmetic carries no linearization error, but the coordinates are the witness's own finite-precision transcription: this settles the retained configuration, not the true optimum. Rigidity and optimality are independent, and this bears only on the former.
- Blocker (mathematics): verified_upper_bound is E-evand-exact-ceilings-2026-10-05-exact-replay's certified side rounded up, 12.77817459305203, which trails the report 12.77817459305202 by 1e-14, and the report's exact form 5 + (11/2)sqrt(2), an irrational side, which no rational certificate reaches: the certificate's own side lies 1.3e-19 above it. Closing the gap needs an exact algebraic certificate of the packing at its closed-form side.
E-kingbird-upper-register
9 evidence entries
E-evand-exact-ceilings-2026-10-05-report, E-evand-exact-ceilings-2026-10-05-exact-replay, E-evand-exact-ceilings-2026-10-05-source-replay, E-kingbird-upper-register, E-nagamochi-lower, E-basic-grid-upper, E-karakus-strip-lower, E-karakus-strip-measure-interval, E-nagamochi-lemma1-counterexample
- [evand exact optima 2026-10-05] formal certificate
- [Kingbird] record catalogue
- [Nagamochi 2005] lower bound proof
- [Friedman DS7] survey
- [Karakuş 2026] lower bound proof
— open
Exact certificate, 2026-10-06. Evan Daniel’s
square-packing published
on 5 October 2026 an exact rational certificate of this packing, decided here over
by two exact checkers that share no code with each other or with the
source, and by the source’s own two run here: it proves ,
the verified upper bound (T-101). Until then the verified upper bound was the trivial
grid bound .
Open. The best known packing gives , and the strongest lower bound independently verified here is from Karakuş’s general theorem, leaving a gap of . General bound: s(N) >= 1/2 + sqrt(N - floor(sqrt(N)) + 1/4).
The verified upper bound is a ceiling
verified_upper_bound for this case is , proved by Evan Daniel’s
exact rational certificate of this packing
(E-evand-exact-ceilings-2026-10-05-exact-replay, T-101). It is larger than the
best known two fields above it, by .
It is not the value of and not a different packing: it is the certificate’s own
side, , rounded up at the fourteen decimals the catalogue
prints. The catalogue gives the packing’s side exactly, as , and the
certificate’s side lies above that: its squares are rational and each is kept
clear of its neighbours and the walls, so it bounds the exact side from above and does
not reach it. That side is irrational, so no rational certificate reaches it.
The mathematics blocker in the frontmatter records the difference.
Read reported_upper_bound for the best known side length.
The exact certificate
Evan Daniel’s
square-packing published
on 5 October 2026 exact rational certificates of the packings this register lists as
best known, solved from its own witnesses, and offered those that do not lower a printed
side as a replay of the existing bounds, asking for nothing to be registered from them.
The certificate for this count holds the same 150 squares, each a rational centre and a
rational , in a square of side ,
above the side the Kingbird catalogue prints, . Square for
square, its pose lies within of the binary64 pose the atlas pictures for this
count. Evan Daniel’s solver moves the binary64 pose to a nearby exact KKT point of the
problem of minimizing the side under non-overlap, computed at 80 digits, and rounds it
outward to rationals.
This repository decides the certificate exactly.
Converted without rounding, every pair and every wall is decided over
twice, by sqpack’s exact separating-axis test and by an independent checker that
shares no code with it, and the source’s own two checkers, run here as retained, accept
it as well
(receipts).
That proves , the verified upper bound: the certificate’s
side rounded up at the fourteen decimals the catalogue prints, as the record writes any
certificate of a printed side.
It says nothing about optimality.
On jlevy/squares#375 its author wrote that the solver, its checkers and the batch “were
written with Claude (Anthropic) as a coding and research agent, directed and reviewed by
me.”
The packing
Found by David Ellsworth in 2025. The recorded construction method is an extension of a smaller record.
The lower bound
The strongest lower bound independently verified in this record is Karakuş’s general bound, which applies to every nonsquare :
Correction, 2 October 2026. Until that date the verified lower bound here was Nagamochi’s general closed form, , which is stronger at this and is now recorded as a reported bound. Its published proof rests on Nagamochi’s Lemma 1, which Karakuş showed false; nothing is disproved, and no packing beating it is known (review of 2 October 2026). This register had recorded that proof as verified, its own error, logged as defect D-516.
Source-reported bounds are recorded separately from this independently verified theorem.
Verification Code
The programs behind this case’s verified bounds, by their evidence.
The code column says how the code that ran stands to the code its producer used.
VERIFIERS.md says what each program is and whose it is.
| bound | evidence | run | code | programs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| verified lower | E-karakus-strip-lower |
a published proof | no code | no verification code |
| verified lower | E-karakus-strip-measure-interval |
audited here | independent | V-check-karakus-strip-measure (first-party) |
| verified upper | E-evand-exact-ceilings-2026-10-05-exact-replay |
replayed here | independent | V-sqpack-verify, V-check-rational-witness-independent (first-party); V-evand-exact-certificates (first-party, premises) |
| verified upper | E-evand-exact-ceilings-2026-10-05-source-replay |
replayed here | producer’s code | V-evand-verify-cert-py, V-evand-verify-cert2-py (external); V-evand-exact-certificates (first-party, premises) |