n = 14 proved ★ corrects Nagamochi 2005O=

s(14)=4

The best packing known for 14 squares, side 4,
4
345
3.7424.742
nn+1

Proven

s(14)=4

  • new result
  • optimal
  • exact

Citation record n-014

lowerchelokot 2026, GitHub corrects Nagamochi 2005 (confirmed T-086)

Bounds

Best known packing

4

Construction
grid
Tilt angles
0∘
Source
[Kingbird]
Evidence
E-kingbird-upper-register
Verified upper bound

4

The reported value, verified here.

Evidence
E-basic-grid-upper
Reported lower bound

4

Proved by
Erich Friedman 2009
Kind
unavoidable points
Note
Friedman's DS7 Theorem 8 starts with twelve almost-unavoidable points; geometric cases and conditional covers complete the argument (archived PDF pp. 21–23).
Source
[Friedman DS7]
Evidence
E-migrated-lower-report
Verified lower bound

4

The reported value, verified here.

Corrects
Nagamochi 2005 (T-007)
Evidence
E-chelokot-square-minus-two-lean
Gap

0

Solved: the verified bounds meet.

Results in the register

Verification

upper: replayed here; lower: replayed here

—

Rigidity

not rigid, numerically checked, numerical multiprecision

Evidence: E-translation-escape-not-rigid

Scope

Square 10 of the retained witness (witness id 11) translates 1 along (0, 1) with the packing still valid, so the configuration admits a non-trivial feasible motion; 3 of its 14 squares do. Every constraint is exactly affine in the slide parameter, so the arithmetic carries no linearization error, but the coordinates are the witness's own finite-precision transcription: this settles the retained configuration, not the true optimum. Rigidity and optimality are independent, and this bears only on the former.

s(14) — solved

s(14)=4. Friedman’s DS7 proof combines geometric case analysis with conditional point covers.

The packing

The record catalogue does not picture n=14: no arrangement has ever been found that beats the trivial ⌈14⌉=4 grid, so the grid is still the best known packing. That is a statement about what has been searched, not a proof.

The lower bound

Friedman’s DS7, Theorem 8, archived PDF pp. 21–23, starts with twelve almost-unavoidable points in a container of side 4−ε. Two of the fourteen squares have interiors missing these points, which localizes their centers. Five configurations up to symmetry, with further subcases, use geometric exclusions and additional conditional point covers (Figures 31–33). The helper steps are part of the proof.

The verified lower-bound evidence recorded here remains the independent Nagamochi result, E-nagamochi-lower. Corrected 2 October 2026: the verified lower bound here is now chelokot’s Lean theorem s(n2−2)=n, replayed here with its axiom receipt (T-086); Nagamochi’s result is a reported bound, his Lemma 1 being false (Karakuş 2026; review). This register had recorded that proof as verified, its own error, logged as defect D-516.

Verification Code

The programs behind this case’s verified bounds, by their evidence. The code column says how the code that ran stands to the code its producer used. VERIFIERS.md says what each program is and whose it is.

bound evidence run code programs
verified lower E-chelokot-square-minus-two-lean replayed here producer’s code V-chelokot-lean (external); V-replay-chelokot-lean (first-party, premises)
verified upper E-basic-grid-upper replayed here independent V-check-basic-bounds (first-party)