n = 130 open ★ corrects Nagamochi 2005≈

11.42016483…≤s(130)≤2977796926637189250000000000000

The best packing known for 130 squares, side 11.91118770…, Francisco Couzo 2026
11.42011.911
111213
11.40212.402
nn+1

Proven

11.420164≤s(130)≤11.911188

  • new result
  • numerical

Citation record n-130

lowerKarakuş 2026, arXiv corrects Nagamochi 2005 (confirmed T-083)

upperCouzo 2026, GitHub (confirmed T-056)

Open

  • optimality
  • exact value

Bounds

Best known packing

11.91118770…

11.911187706548755
Found by
Francisco Couzo 2026
Construction
—
Source
[franciscouzo square-packing 2026-09-27]
Evidence
E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-report
Verified upper bound

2977796926637189250000000000000

11.911187706548756

The reported value, verified here.

Evidence
E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-exact-replay, E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-interval-replay
Reported lower bound

11.44030650…

11.44030650891
Proved by
Hiroshi Nagamochi 2005
Kind
Nagamochi
Note
General closed form: s(N) >= min(ceil(sqrt(N)), sqrt(N - 2*floor(sqrt(N)) + 1) + 1).
Source
[Nagamochi 2005]
Evidence
E-nagamochi-lower
Verified lower bound

11.42016483…

11.4201648339
Corrects
Nagamochi 2005 (T-007)
Evidence
E-karakus-strip-lower, E-karakus-strip-measure-interval
Gap

0.49102287…

Verified upper minus verified lower.

Results in the register

Verification

upper: replayed here; lower: external proof (read here), audited here

formal lower differs from report; reported lower: defect recorded

Rigidity

not rigid, numerically checked, numerical multiprecision

Evidence: E-translation-escape-not-rigid

Scope

Square 0 of the retained witness (witness id 1) translates 0.000001 along (0, 1) with the packing still valid, so the configuration admits a non-trivial feasible motion; 46 of its 130 squares do. Every constraint is exactly affine in the slide parameter, so the arithmetic carries no linearization error, but the coordinates are the witness's own finite-precision transcription: this settles the retained configuration, not the true optimum. Rigidity and optimality are independent, and this bears only on the former.

s(130) — open

Open. The best known published packing, Francisco Couzo’s (T-056), gives s(130)≤11.911187706548755, and the strongest lower bound independently verified here is 11.420164 from Karakuş’s general theorem, leaving a gap of 0.491. General bound: s(N) >= 1/2 + sqrt(N - floor(sqrt(N)) + 1/4).

The packing

Francisco Couzo’s square-packing reports a packing of side 11.911187706548755 for this count, dated 26 September 2026 and unchanged when this record retained the repository on 27 September 2026 (T-056). The repository names no method and no tolerance, and itself states no AI assistance; its author said on issue #227 that he found the 102 and 103 packings “with the help of Claude”.

This repository certifies it exactly. The retained decimal pose rounds to an exact rational packing at centre dilation 1, of side 11.9111877065487555592…, 5.592×10−16 above the printed side, and every pair and every wall is decided over ℚ twice, by the promotion’s exact separating-axis test and by an independent checker that shares no code with it (receipt). That proves s(130)≤11.911187706548756, the verified upper bound; it says nothing about optimality. Interval arithmetic on the printed pose itself, with each angle’s true cosine and sine and no rational rounding, decides every pair and wall again and gives the same verified upper bound (interval route).

The previous best known packing

Before this intake the best known packing was the Kingbird catalogue’s, of side 11.91119052015898.

Found by David Ellsworth in 2024. Improved by David W. Cantrell in November 2024. Improved by David Ellsworth in November 2024. The recorded construction method is an extension of a smaller record. Its side length is algebraic of degree 8 over ℚ.

The lower bound

The strongest lower bound independently verified in this record is Karakuş’s general bound, which applies to every nonsquare N≥8:

s(N)≥12+N−⌊N⌋+14

Correction, 2 October 2026. Until that date the verified lower bound here was Nagamochi’s general closed form, s(N)≥min(⌈N⌉,N−2⌊N⌋+1+1), which is stronger at this n and is now recorded as a reported bound. Its published proof rests on Nagamochi’s Lemma 1, which Karakuş showed false; nothing is disproved, and no packing beating it is known (review of 2 October 2026). This register had recorded that proof as verified, its own error, logged as defect D-516.

Source-reported bounds are recorded separately from this independently verified theorem.

Verification Code

The programs behind this case’s verified bounds, by their evidence. The code column says how the code that ran stands to the code its producer used. VERIFIERS.md says what each program is and whose it is.

bound evidence run code programs
verified lower E-karakus-strip-lower a published proof no code no verification code
verified lower E-karakus-strip-measure-interval audited here independent V-check-karakus-strip-measure (first-party)
verified upper E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-exact-replay replayed here independent V-upper-bound-promotion, V-check-rational-witness-independent (first-party)
verified upper E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-interval-replay replayed here independent V-upper-bound-intervals (first-party)