n = 130 open ★ corrects Nagamochi 2005≈
Proven
- new result
- numerical
Citation record n-130
lowerKarakuş 2026, arXiv corrects Nagamochi 2005 (confirmed T-083)
upperCouzo 2026, GitHub (confirmed T-056)
Open
- optimality
- exact value
Bounds
11.91118770…
11.911187706548755- Found by
- Francisco Couzo 2026
- Construction
- —
- Source
- [franciscouzo square-packing 2026-09-27]
- Evidence
E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-report
11.911187706548756
The reported value, verified here.
11.44030650…
11.44030650891- Proved by
- Hiroshi Nagamochi 2005
- Kind
- Nagamochi
- Note
- General closed form: >= min(ceil(sqrt(N)), sqrt(N - 2*floor(sqrt(N)) + 1) + 1).
- Source
- [Nagamochi 2005]
- Evidence
E-nagamochi-lower
11.42016483…
11.4201648339- Corrects
- Nagamochi 2005 (T-007)
- Evidence
E-karakus-strip-lower,E-karakus-strip-measure-interval
0.49102287…
Verified upper minus verified lower.
Results in the register
T-007 V0 C1 Nagamochi · 2026-08-31 · 321 cases
for
T-056 V3 C3 Couzo · 2026-09-29 · 49 cases
Smaller packings for 49 counts from to , each certified two independent ways
T-083 V3 C3 Karakuş · 2026-10-02 · 301 cases
for every nonsquare
T-085 V3 C3 Karakuş; chelokot · 2026-10-02 · 315 cases
Nagamochi 2005, Lemma 1 is false for every container with and
upper: replayed here; lower: external proof (read here), audited here
formal lower differs from report; reported lower: defect recorded
not rigid, numerically checked, numerical multiprecision
Evidence: E-translation-escape-not-rigid
Scope
Square 0 of the retained witness (witness id 1) translates 0.000001 along (0, 1) with the packing still valid, so the configuration admits a non-trivial feasible motion; 46 of its 130 squares do. Every constraint is exactly affine in the slide parameter, so the arithmetic carries no linearization error, but the coordinates are the witness's own finite-precision transcription: this settles the retained configuration, not the true optimum. Rigidity and optimality are independent, and this bears only on the former.
9 evidence entries
E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-report, E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-exact-replay, E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-interval-replay, E-kingbird-upper-register, E-nagamochi-lower, E-basic-grid-upper, E-karakus-strip-lower, E-karakus-strip-measure-interval, E-nagamochi-lemma1-counterexample
- [franciscouzo square-packing 2026-09-27] upper bound report
- [Kingbird] record catalogue
- [Nagamochi 2005] lower bound proof
- [Friedman DS7] survey
- [Karakuş 2026] lower bound proof
— open
Open. The best known published packing, Francisco Couzo’s (T-056), gives , and the strongest lower bound independently verified here is from Karakuş’s general theorem, leaving a gap of . General bound: s(N) >= 1/2 + sqrt(N - floor(sqrt(N)) + 1/4).
The packing
Francisco Couzo’s
square-packing
reports a packing of side for this count, dated 26 September 2026
and unchanged when this record retained the repository on 27 September 2026 (T-056). The
repository names no method and no tolerance, and itself states no AI assistance; its
author said on issue #227 that he found
the 102 and 103 packings “with the help of Claude”.
This repository certifies it exactly. The retained decimal pose rounds to an exact rational packing at centre dilation 1, of side , above the printed side, and every pair and every wall is decided over twice, by the promotion’s exact separating-axis test and by an independent checker that shares no code with it (receipt). That proves , the verified upper bound; it says nothing about optimality. Interval arithmetic on the printed pose itself, with each angle’s true cosine and sine and no rational rounding, decides every pair and wall again and gives the same verified upper bound (interval route).
The previous best known packing
Before this intake the best known packing was the Kingbird catalogue’s, of side .
Found by David Ellsworth in 2024. Improved by David W. Cantrell in November 2024. Improved by David Ellsworth in November 2024. The recorded construction method is an extension of a smaller record. Its side length is algebraic of degree 8 over .
The lower bound
The strongest lower bound independently verified in this record is Karakuş’s general bound, which applies to every nonsquare :
Correction, 2 October 2026. Until that date the verified lower bound here was Nagamochi’s general closed form, , which is stronger at this and is now recorded as a reported bound. Its published proof rests on Nagamochi’s Lemma 1, which Karakuş showed false; nothing is disproved, and no packing beating it is known (review of 2 October 2026). This register had recorded that proof as verified, its own error, logged as defect D-516.
Source-reported bounds are recorded separately from this independently verified theorem.
Verification Code
The programs behind this case’s verified bounds, by their evidence.
The code column says how the code that ran stands to the code its producer used.
VERIFIERS.md says what each program is and whose it is.
| bound | evidence | run | code | programs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| verified lower | E-karakus-strip-lower |
a published proof | no code | no verification code |
| verified lower | E-karakus-strip-measure-interval |
audited here | independent | V-check-karakus-strip-measure (first-party) |
| verified upper | E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-exact-replay |
replayed here | independent | V-upper-bound-promotion, V-check-rational-witness-independent (first-party) |
| verified upper | E-franciscouzo-2026-09-27-interval-replay |
replayed here | independent | V-upper-bound-intervals (first-party) |